How to Be Both Rich and Happy: Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Strategic Reasoning about Multi-Player Games (Extended Abstract)
نویسندگان
چکیده
We propose a logical framework combining a game-theoretic study of abilities of agents to achieve quantitative objectives in multi-player games by optimizing payoffs or preferences on outcomes with a logical analysis of the abilities of players for achieving qualitative objectives of players, i.e., reaching or maintaining game states with desired properties. We enrich concurrent game models with payoffs for the normal form games associated with the states of the model and propose a quantitative extension of the logic ATL∗ enabling the combination of quantitative and qualitative reasoning.
منابع مشابه
How to Be Both Rich and Happy: Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Strategic Reasoning about Multi-Player Games
متن کامل
How to Be Both Rich and Happy: Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Strategic Reasoning
We propose a logical framework combining a game-theoretic study of abilities of agents to achieve quantitative objectives in multi-player games by optimizing payoffs or preferences on outcomes with a logical analysis of the abilities of players for achieving qualitative objectives of players, i.e., reaching or maintaining game states with desired properties. We enrich concurrent game models wit...
متن کاملExpressiveness and Complexity Results for Strategic Reasoning
Abstract This paper presents a range of expressiveness and complexity results for the specification, computation, and verification of Nash equilibria in multi-player non-zero-sum concurrent games in which players have goals expressed as temporal logic formulae. Our results are based on a novel approach to the characterisation of equilibria in such games: a semantic characterisation based on win...
متن کاملModeling social preferences in multi-player games
Game-tree search algorithms have contributed greatly to the success of computerized players in two-player extensive-form games. In multi-player games there has been less success, partly because of the difficulty of recognizing and reasoning about the inter-player relationships that often develop and change during human game-play. Simplifying assumptions (e.g., assuming each player selfishly aim...
متن کاملRunning head : THEORY OF MIND AND INFERENCES 1 Using Our Theory of Mind for Inferences in Strategic Reasoning
Prior investigations into theory of mind have used strategic games to examine how an opponent’s known preferences are used to determine behavior. However, in the social setting, preferences are not always known. Mental state information often comes from observing another person’s decision and inferring what motivated that decision. This study extended the strategic game framework to explore the...
متن کامل